Whispering in the Wind (WITW 74) May 6, 2015
I’m writing this column not knowing who Alberta’s next
premier is and you will be reading the same column knowing who the premier-elect
is – an interesting mix-up due to my copy deadline. So let me describe some of the shenanigans going
on in Ottawa as it relates to the Mike Duffy trial and leave the Alberta
election results and the consequences for next week’s column.
Duffy
Trial – An Expose of Privilege and Interference
The so called Duffy trial is well into its third week of
deliberation with no clear end-date in sight.
Witnesses for the prosecution are being put on the stand to castigate
Mr. Duffy and his actions, suggesting that his actions were somehow unusual and
singular in the Red Chamber. Mr. Duffy’s
defence is more subtle at this stage in the trial, arguing that the rules of
conduct within the Senate chamber were ill-defined at best, and virtually
non-existent when it comes to application – and most definitely, strongly influenced
by outside political forces.
Arguing
With Opinion, Rather Than Evidence
Presently the judge is hearing legal arguments on the
tabling of a 2010 Ernst & Young audit report that deals with Senate
expenditures. The prosecution is arguing
that the report is hearsay and not relevant in the trial against Mike
Duffy. Further, the prosecution
considers the tabling of the document as an infringement of “parliamentary
privilege”. Added to the legal wrangling,
Judge Charles Vaillancourt has already expressed some frustration with the
prosecution’s strategy and how they are presenting, through witnesses, opinion
as evidence. From my perspective, the
prosecution’s strategy and the use of “parliamentary privilege” is a key
element in protecting others from prosecution while at the same time win their
case against Mike Duffy. How Judge
Vaillancourt rules on the 2010 Senate report is yet to come but it is worth
noting, by not tabling the report the public will view the situation as a major
cover-up on the part of the Conservative led Senate and interference by the
Harper government. And one cannot forget
the yet to be tabled Auditor General Ferguson’s report on Senate expenditures –
an investigation that started two years ago.
Mr. Ferguson’s report is expected to be given to the leader of the
Senate for consideration in the first week of June.
A
Final Thought
I continue to support the Senate as an extremely
important government institution and a major pillar in Canada’s parliamentary
system, but the Mike Duffy trial has exposed the Red Chamber as a broken
institution that is in desperate need of fixing. Only Justin Trudeau took reasonable action by
declaring Liberal Senators to be Independent and recommending that future
Senators be declared with the advice from an independent panal.
No comments:
Post a Comment