Tuesday, 13 October 2015

The Demise of Stephen Harper




Whisper in the Wind (WITW 93) October 14, 2015
This is my last “kick at the cat” when it comes to the October 19 election, so if you’re on the wrong side of what is to come, read and weep. 
The Polls
Public opinion polls are indicating that the three major parties and their leaders are not admitting defeat when it comes to support from the Canadian electorate.  The latest polls are showing Justin Trudeau’s Liberals at 34.2 percent support, Stephen Harper’s Conservatives at 31.7 percent and Thomas Mulcair’s NDP at 23.4 percent.  Public support appears to be swinging toward Justin Trudeau and the Liberals, all at the expense of both the NDP and the Conservatives.  Another poll taken a while back by the Ipsos Reid organization indicated that 70 percent of the Canadian electorate want a change of direction in Ottawa – suggesting that the three way political log-jam of confusion has been around for some time.  Said another way and voiced by the former premier of Newfoundland and Labrador, Danny Williams:  “Anything But Conservative”. 
All is Not Well in the Conservative Camp 
While the Ipsos Reid poll suggests 70 percent of Canada’s population is dissatisfied with Mr. Harper’s government, there is indication that there is some softening of support within the rank and file of the conservative movement itself.  Amongst the conservative elite, the feelings are all about Mr. Harper and his style of governance, the feeling is mixed.  Former Prime Minister Joe Clark is quite critical of Mr. Harper and his governance style; including his approach to foreign affairs matters and specifically his dealing in Ukraine.  Mr. Clark also questions Mr. Harper’s approach to the Senate expenses scandal and the Duffy trial.  The former Progressive Conservative prime minister recommends that Mr. Harper “bring people into the facts … {Stephen Harper] needs to tell the real story and he needs to seek some advice as to what’s the most effective way to do that”.  Brian Mulroney, another former conservative prime minister chastised Stephen Harper for his spats with the Supreme Court of Canada; his negative attitude toward the United Nations and his un-relationship with the United States’ president, Barack Obama.  An even more caustic rebuke of Stephen Harper was spewed out by former Progressive Conservative premier of Newfoundland and Labrador, Danny Williams.  In a recent interview Mr. Williams observed that Stephen Harper can’t be trusted:  “Over time we have seen this man cannot be trusted.  He had no integrity.  He’s trying to stifle democracy.  There is no end to what he’s doing.”  Danny Williams ended up saying  “He’s a lousy prime minister who’s divisive.”  To balance the stark rebukes of the more progressive conservative right thinkers, Preston Manning (the guru of the Reform Party and thought to be Stephen Harper’s mentor) has very strong reservations about Mr. Harper’s management style (ruthless) and strongly disagrees with some of his legislation (the Fair Elections Act).  As to whether any of these disagreements and hostile voices are pervasive within the general conservative movement,  and whether these elitist voices are going to impact the voting intentions amongst the rank and file in the Conservative Party on Election Day, only time will tell? I hope it will, so let me add My Perspective .  As a somewhat disillusioned conservative, let me make three points which I feel should be considered when deciding who to vote for on October 19.  First, Mr. Harper has in the past 10 years become a “one man party” and that in itself is a very dangerous situation in Canada – for a single individual to wield so much unbridled control and power in a democracy like Canada is simply unacceptable.  Second, Mr. Harper is a laissez-fairest (an individual who feels that the economy should be in the hands of the corporate, business world with little or no interference from government).  Third, Mr. Harper’s disrespect for Canada’s parliamentary system and its institutions (Supreme Court of Canada, the Canadian Senate, et al) is, in my mind a threat to how Canadians will be governed in the future.      
Justin Trudeau; on a Roll, will it Last?
Justin Trudeau is on a roll and his successes should not be discounted – after all is said and done, it’s possible Mr. Trudeau could be Canada’s 23rd prime minister.  Polls are indicating that Mr. Trudeau has a 34.3 approval rating amongst the Canadian electorate and his status appears to be growing.  If the up-starts momentum continues he could become Canada’s next prime minister with a “majority” Liberal government.  What is phenomenal about Trudeau’s success is that he has moved from a dismal third place at the beginning of the campaign, to the public’s top choice six days from October 19 election.  In the leadership debates that I saw Mr. Trudeau was articulate about his positions and was aggressive enough (some have called him testy) to put his opponents on edge – proving that he could stand up to the more seasoned Stephen Harper and Thomas Mulcair.  While the re-election strategy for Mr. Harper was to promote fear (if he weren’t to be re-elected) and Mr. Mulcair, lashing out with anger and hostility whenever his opponents promoted anything; Justin Trudeau’s strategy was to be pragmatic, realistic and positive.  Mr. Trudeau’s basic stance on the Canadian economy was sputtering (denied by Harper) and the public’s intense interest in jobs and security of their particular work environment played out well for the Liberals.  Mr. Trudeau’s solution to the present economic woes of Canada caused him to put forward a massive infrastructure program that will be paid for after the economy starts to move in the right direction – a slam-dunk for Justin Trudeau and accepted by many voters across the country – it was also a positive, confidence builder in an uncertain, apprehensive population.  There are two other actions taken by Justin Trudeau worth mentioning which clearly demonstrates Trudeau’s personal approach to parliamentary democracy.  Last year at the height of the Senate expenses scandal Mr. Trudeau abruptly removed the Liberal members of the Senate from his parliamentary caucus and declared the labelled Liberal Senators Independent.  While this action is not a solution to the many Senate issues and problems, it is the beginning of a solution and should not be ignored.  Another classy move made by Justin Trudeau deals with the European Refugee Crisis.  In the House of Commons debate on the crisis, Mr. Trudeau suggested a meeting of party leaders to address Canada’s role in the crisis and how to speed up the refugee application process, giving due attention to security – Trudeau’s recommendation was rejected.  While Mr. Trudeau has proven himself to be a strong contender for the country’s top political job and he is fortunate to have a strong, experienced Liberal organization backing him up. Nevertheless there is still 6 days of campaigning to go – I sincerely hope he doesn’t stumble.              
Tom Mulcair is Stumbling, Can He Recover?
Last week in this column I identified Stephen Harper, Justin Trudeau and Thomas Mulcair as three mythological titans battling it out with spears of political accusations and personal condemnations.  Mr. Mulcair proved himself to be an outstanding warrior when he battled against Stephen Harper in the House of Commons on the Senate Expenses Scandal and the Mike Duffy Affair.  Unfortunately something happened to the Mulcair campaign on the ground, in the trenches (particularly in Quebec) that is causing his poll numbers to plummet into the 20s – that’s not good news for the Mr. Mulcair / NDP campaign.  In the 2011 election the NDP won 59 seats in Quebec and consolidated their Official Opposition status in Ottawa.  The current polls are indicating that the NDP are strong in 42 ridings – it is no wonder that the Conservatives and Liberals in Quebec are like vultures purporting to be the best choice in next Monday’s election.  Another important factor comes into play and possibly is the answer to the NDP declines.   A month ago when the Conservatives, NDP, Liberals were tied in the polls a glib observation was made, the NDP and the Liberals were fighting over who would end up in second place.  Maybe the public have made up their minds and are swinging toward the Liberals.  In Quebec there are other complicating factors that are impacting voter preference.  In rural Quebec the Niqab issue remains an issue and Mr. Mulcair hasn’t been able to finesse the issue, so the NDP leader responded by saying Mr. Harper is playing the race card – that might be the case but the Niqab issue resonated differently in rural Quebec and Mr. Mulcair didn’t see the difference?  The Bloc Quebecois is another wild card in Quebec politics but it appears that the party and its leader Gilles Duceppe will have minimal impact on the final results – winning 3 or 4 seats in the House of Commons.  Fortunately for Mr. Mulcair, it appears that his difficulties in Quebec are not dramatically affecting his support in other parts of the country.
A Final Thought on Leadership
While the battle between Harper, Mulcair and Trudeau will be settled in a few short days with the result being significant, if not “earth shaking” for Canada.  What has been lost in the kerfuffle is the sane, sagged views of Elizabeth May and the Green Party of Canada.  Her limited participation in the debates and her strenuous efforts should not be discounted.  In the end, she will make a difference in tomorrow’s political environment.     

No comments:

Post a Comment