Whispering in the Wind (WITW 37) July 23, 2014
The RCMP has concluded its investigation into the Mike
Duffy affair and last week charged Mike Duffy with 31 counts of breach of
trust, bribery and fraud. The charges relate
to Mr. Duffy’s actions while he functioned as Senator in good standing, province
of Prince Edward Island (a four year timeframe). In a television interview and just after the RCMP
charges commented that he welcomed the opportunity to clear his name in a court
of law and was confident that the 31 charges would be proven to be unfounded
and unwarranted. Mr. Duffy will formally
respond to the charges on September 16, 2014.
In one respect the RCMP charges against the “suspended” Senator brings some
resolution to one major element in what has been labeled the Senate Expenses Scandal – a scandal
involving numerous administrative issues in the Red Chamber and numerous sitting
Senators and their feeling of entitlement.
For Mr. Duffy, it is now up to the judicial process to determine fact
from fiction; political intrigue from political conspiracy and yes, the very real
possibility of high stakes political cover ups.
For the moment little can be added to the RCMP allegations other than
it’s going to take a long time to be assessed, judged and juried. From my perspective and it is only a gut
feeling, I feel that the results of the Mike Duffy trial will have major impacts
and consequences on how Canadians will be governed in the future. Two issues jump out as needing immediate comment:
The
31 Charges Framed by the RCMP
The 31 charges laid by the RCMP are understandably
wrapped in legal jargon but in essence it comes down to Mike Duffy being
charged with: One count each of fraud
and breach of trust related to his residency expenses (2 counts). Nine counts of fraud and nine counts of
breach of trust for expenses unrelated to Senate business (18 counts). Four counts of fraud and four counts of
breach of trust related to the awarding of consulting contracts (8 counts). One count each of bribery, fraud on the
government and breach of trust related to a $90,000 payment to Mr. Duffy from
Mr. Wright.
What is confusing about the 31 charge; two thirds (20 of
the 31 charges) relate to expense judgements made by Mr. Duffy regarding
residency and unrelated business expenses, these expenses should have been
rejected, (or at least flagged) by the appropriate administrative body within
the Senate that deals with reviewing Senator expenses. Many, many months ago Mr. Duffy indicated
that the expenses he claimed followed the acceptable rules of play in the
Senate at the time the expenses were incurred – to apply a new set of rules to
his historical expenses is unjustified and unacceptable protocol. In the end I
do not think the issue of expenses will become a major factor in any judgement
for or against Mr. Duffy – if Mr. Duffy is found guilty of the expense related
charges a good number of other Senators will have to be charged as well.
Regarding the charges of fraud and breach of trust for
hiring outside consultants, very little information is known as to the nature
of the consultancy work undertaken, so at this point in time no further comment
is necessary.
As to the bribery, fraud and breach of trust charges related
to the $90,000 cheque to Mike Duffy from Nigel Wright (then chief of staff to
Prime Minister Harper) is, in my view, the king pin issue in the Duffy charges that
involves Prime Minister Harper himself and a number of his handlers. The first question posed by many
observers: Why is Nigel Wright exempt
from charges for writing the $90,000 check, while Mr. Duffy is being charged
for accepting it? For the moment legal
experts are discussing two different federal laws – Section 119 and 121 of the Criminal Code of Canada which indicates
that it is an offence to accept funds for a benefit and the Parliament of Canada Act which makes it
an offence to give money to a senator.
Mr. Duffy has speculated that the trial will begin in the
spring of 2015 and he will be able to discount all charges and identify the
real circumstances and culprits.
The
Next Federal Election
There was never a doubt in my mind that the next federal
election was take place in October, 2015.
Nevertheless, a couple of weeks ago I received an e-mail from a good
friend living in eastern Canada where he described a rumor circulating about the
possibility of a federal election being called earlier than originally
scheduled – largely because of the anticipated rejection of the Keystone
pipeline proposal to ship Alberta bitumen to Texas and a general downturn in
the Canadian economy. With Mr. Duffy
being as confident as he is to show his innocence, the real circumstances of
the scandal and the real culprits – so an earlier, spring 2015 election is in the cards and would be
most beneficial for Prime Minister Harper and the Conservative Party of Canada.
Who knows?
No comments:
Post a Comment